Opposition to the new world order. Interreligious dialogue as a political issue

"The Ugly Tower of the New World Order"

At the conference “World Evil against Russia,” its participants proposed methods for saving the country and earthly civilization

Image: Imagno/Getty Images/Fotobank

The conference “World Evil against Russia” (that’s right, via i) was held at the Central House of Tourists, organized by the Orthodox Revival Union and the Resistance to the New World Order movement. Those gathered unanimously came to the conclusion that the “last days” had come, but Russia has salvation - to return to traditional values and unite in the fight against Khazaria and the “electronic concentration camp.”

In the lobby in front of the conference hall, 30 minutes before the start, visitors began to arrive - mostly elderly people, good-looking women in headscarves (one of them had a badge with a portrait of Nicholas II pinned on her clothes), as well as a small number of young activists. Visitors walked between tables with all kinds of literature devoted to the conspiracy of world Jewry, the dangers of the electronic passport, and opposition to all this disgrace.

The three main leaflets, which were distributed to everyone free of charge, were replete with classic information in such an environment about the satanic barcode in which the number of the Beast is hidden, as well as the fact that in general all electronic documents are necessary so that the Antichrist has the tools of control over people in his hands. Particularly unlucky was SNILS (individual personal account insurance number), “the key to all databases about a person who has all the signs of an apocalyptic mark.” “This green card, to the delight of sodomites, provides for a change of gender of the owner - pay attention,” noted the compiler of the leaflet.

A couple of men in their 60s were exchanging remarks regarding the liberal politician Boris Nemtsov, who had been killed the day before.

He died for his Jewish causes. Somewhere at one or two o’clock there was a loud bang, in St. Petersburg, I think,” one said.
“No, in Moscow,” the second objected.
“The Americans promised to increase pressure on us - of course, they killed their own,” said a woman standing at the table with thematic brochures confidently.

The conference hall, like the lobby, was full of impressively sized posters with the slogans “To whom the church is not a mother, God is not a father,” “Holy Rus' is invincible!”, “Today - a number, tomorrow - a card, the day after tomorrow - a seal,” “We demand the adoption of a law on a traditional paper passport.” Most notable was a hand-drawn poster depicting a black raven with an electronic passport in its talons and a white dove holding an olive branch. The composition was completed by the inscription “No to the electronic concentration camp!”

Women in headscarves briskly scurried around the hall, looking for places closer to the speakers, took up chairs, and more and more posters, flags and slogans appeared on the walls, which were carefully hung by members of the conference presidium. Before the start of the event, a mustachioed middle-aged man recited the Lord’s Prayer in an anxious voice, which was echoed by almost the entire audience. Dozens of voices repeating words in a sing-song voice in different tones created a frightening dissonance.

The first to read his report was publicist Vladimir Osipov, who is both the head of the Christian Revival union and the leader of the Resistance to the New World Order movement. The very first words of Osipov, a man of respectable age, sitting in a wheelchair, left no doubt about the essence of the “world’s evil”: it turned out to be Jews and Freemasons.

The speaker especially noted the services to Russia of the nationalist writer Oleg Platonov, calling him “an intelligence officer of Holy Rus' who penetrated into the United States and visited many important Masonic lodges, finding out their criminal secrets.” Osipov said that, according to Platonov, the destruction of Orthodox statehood leads to the reign of the Antichrist and in the current situation, the Russian Orthodox Church is the only one that has preserved the purity of the apostolic doctrine. According to him, at the beginning of the 20th century, power in European countries passed into the hands of the Freemasons, and in the USA they belonged to them from the very beginning. He called America "a territory of denationalized nomads concerned with things, goods and sex."

Osipov explained that Freemasons in the United States oppress Christians, fighting the installation of Christian symbols in institutions and schools, and the Church of Satan has been accepted into the country's National Council of Churches. The publicist said that more than a hundred Satanic chaplains served in the American army. “Against this background, allowing US military personnel to have sex with animals seems like a trifle,” he stated. The writer also noted that in 1987, “Mason President Reagan publicly acknowledged the important role of Satanism in modern American life.”

Osipov then began to denounce Karl Marx, whom he called “the main devil-worshipper,” and his followers, talking about how the Soviet government destroyed churches and killed clergy. The collapse of the USSR did not bring relief, because forces allegedly came to power that openly worshiped Satan and oriented the country “toward integration into the Judeo-Masonic civilization.”

The writer did not ignore such an important topic as homosexuality. He said that if in the 19th century the proportion of people with a non-standard sexual orientation in the United States did not exceed 2 percent, now, after allowing “propaganda,” it has reached 25 percent. The leader of the “Resistance to the New World Order” did not explain where he got such data from (according to the US Census, in 2010 the proportion of people with an alternative sexual orientation in it was 3.8 percent).

Then Osipov quickly went through the Vatican pontiffs - all of them, as it turned out, had sold out to the Freemasons and Satan. The writer said that Pope Pius XI considered Christians to be “spiritual Semites” and coordinated his decisions with the rabbis, and Pope John Paul II openly joined the Masonic lodge. Osipov was also not pleased by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, who is allegedly fully supported by the United States and is preparing to liquidate Orthodoxy at the Eighth Ecumenical Council in 2016 through the implementation of reformist policies.

The writer also spoke about the reduction of the world's population in the interests of the “golden billion”, the dangers of cosmopolitanism, and also did not forget to recall the “Dulles Plan”. At the end of his speech, Osipov added that the militias of Novorossiya are inspired by God, the Tsar and the Fatherland, and on their banner is the face of Christ. “We saw it on TV,” he noted.

Following Osipov, Konstantin Sokolov, vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, came to the podium. His task was to explain to the audience what was happening in the world.

According to him, Russia is the center of the world, and that is why the West wants to conquer it, making Russians slaves and servants. Sokolov said that the United States already has a large system of concentration camps, waiting in the wings - unwanted residents of their country (Latin Americans and blacks) will be sent to them. “You can type REX 84 on the Internet and see how American concentration camps, railway prisons have been prepared and are now mothballed, and multimillion-dollar stocks of plastic coffins have been made,” he informed the audience.

Sokolov also urged not to rely on the Russian government - after all, its multi-billion dollar assets are stored in the West. As an example of the pro-Western position of the state leadership, he cited the failed capture of Mariupol by the DPR forces, when the pro-Russian militias were stopped two steps away from taking the city. Sokolov also spoke about the world's behind-the-scenes plans for Ukraine: supposedly there are plans to reduce its population to 8 million people and revive Khazaria with its capital in Dnepropetrovsk.

He, like the people talking in the lobby, attributed Nemtsov’s murder to a provocation by the West, to a signal for the gathering of the Maidan and “bringing pro-Western forces into a mobilized state.” Sokolov urged not to believe the “paid” Duma and the Federation Council, which “gave Siberia to the Chinese.”

Orthodox lawyer Irina Chepurnaya began her speech by telling how the Jews, having linked their hopes for the restoration of statehood with the Messiah, rejected the true Messiah Jesus Christ. Now, she said, the Jews are preparing a “voluntary unification of the world” under the leadership of the Antichrist. “An ugly tower of a new world order is being built,” she stated.

Chepurnaya saw the answers to these challenges in the suppression of passions, the recognition of Orthodoxy as the main religion in Russia and called for “begging for Holy Rus'.” She also emphasized the inadmissibility of introducing digital population identifiers in the country.

The man who sensitively read the “Our Father” at the beginning of the event turned out to be Slavic philologist Ilya Chislov. In his speech, he, first of all, emphasized that now there is a battle between the Russian God-bearing people and the God-killing Jewish people.

Slavist emphasized that Church hierarchs should not attend programs of federal television channels - first of all, programs of the TV presenter “the blasphemer Solovyov.” “If Archpriest Dimitry Smirnov stood up and turned his back to Solovyov, then there would immediately be fewer sodomites, fewer Masons, and Maidan supporters would retreat,” Chislov said.

He also complained that in the area of the Ukrainian village of Debaltsevo, “American, English and Israeli special forces were released from encirclement under the guise of civilians.” “The German Merkel flew with Hollande to petition that the Israeli special forces from the encirclement be released,” the Slavist was indignant. Chislov, however, called not to demonize Western Europe and to equate Europe and the West, since “there will be no fourth Rome in Beijing and Orthodoxy remains the religion of the European race.”

Although it may seem that the speakers were limited to brief abstracts, this is not so - if each report was written down verbatim, there would be enough text for a medium-sized book. The next speaker, Nikolai Mishustin, head of the Moscow City Duma working group on protecting the rights of citizens from the UEC and families and children from juvenile technologies, could claim authorship of an entire section in it. But here only some of the issues he raised will be briefly summarized.

Mishustin began his speech with a report on the success of his activities: it was thanks to the efforts of his group that the adoption of the project to put into operation the UEC (Universal Electronic Card) was postponed for two years. He noted that this period should be devoted to the fight to cancel the project. “Either we will defeat this, or then little will depend on us,” he frightened the audience, stating that otherwise the government “will close in and become dictatorial.”

Ultimately, the uncontrolled collection of information will lead to the distribution of the population into several castes: the first, the creative class, will begin to travel abroad and learn how to command the rest, the second will include workers and peasants, and the third will include slave servants. According to Mishustin, only the scientific paradigm will be acceptable to the state, and supporters of traditional values will begin to be sent to concentration camps.

He ended his report with a warning about an imminent war, the main sign of which he called the increased activity of “black transplantologists.” According to Mishustin, a similar situation was observed in Serbia before the war - the pest doctors who gathered there began to cut out internal organs from all prisoners, especially children, for subsequent transplantation.

Before the adoption of the conference resolution, Tatyana Lemesheva, a member of the “Resistance to the World Order” movement, took the floor. Next to her lay an impressive-looking stack of paper, clearly hinting that her performance would not end quickly. Lemesheva did not disappoint those present - in the middle of the report on Holocaust denial, as well as calls to ban the Jewish book “Shulchan Aruch” as extremist, many in the hall and on the presidium fell into a restless sleep. The speech lasted an hour and a half and became the final, most powerful chord of the event.

At the moment of its completion, half of the hall stood up in a single impulse and began to make their way to the exits, but Irina Chepurnaya asked everyone to stay and vote for an appeal to the Jewish congresses, Israel and the UN with a call to pacify the oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who, according to the document, is guilty of the war in Ukraine. Those present unanimously voted “yes” and rushed to the doors.

ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE NEWSPAPER "ORTHODOX CROSS"

AGAIN ABOUT THE FUTURE
"PAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL"

On the initiative of the public movement “Resistance to the New World Order” on April 12 this year. A round table was organized in Moscow “What is the danger of the upcoming “Pan-Orthodox Council” in 2016?” The event was attended by clergy and laity who actively opposed the spread of ecumenism and renovationism and defended the purity of Orthodoxy and conciliar principles in the Church of Christ.

Speakers: head of the movement “Resistance to the New World Order”, writer, member of the Union of Writers of Russia Vladimir Nikolaevich Osipov; cleric of the Church of the Icon of the Mother of God “Joy of All Who Sorrow” at the Kalitnikovskoye Cemetery in Moscow, priest Pavel Burov; rector of the Church of St. Nicholas on Bersenevka in Moscow, Hegumen Kirill (Sakharov); cleric of the Assumption Cathedral in Kolomna, Archpriest Igor Tarasov; candidate of historical sciences, associate professor, teacher at MGIMO Olga Nikolaevna Chetverikova and many others. For our readers who do not have the opportunity to view the two-part video recording of the round table on the Internet, we have prepared a review of some of the speeches made in the first part.

Opening the round table, its moderator, an Orthodox lawyer Irina Yurievna Chepurnaya explained the purpose of the event: “Over the past few years, Patriarch Bartholomew (Archondonis) of Constantinople has taken a number of steps aimed at accelerating the convening of the so-called “Holy and Great Pan-Orthodox Council,” which has been in preparation for more than half a century. The need to intensify preparations for the council was also discussed at the last meeting of the Primates of the Local Orthodox Churches, held on March 6–9 this year. in the Patriarchal Cathedral of St. George the Victorious on Phanar (Istanbul), which was attended by delegations of 13 Local Orthodox Churches: Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, Russian, Georgian, Serbian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Cypriot, Hellenic, Albanian and Polish . During the meeting, it was decided to convene the “Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church” in Constantinople in 2016, unless unforeseen circumstances prevent this. Commenting on the agreement reached at the meeting, some clergy and journalists expressed satisfaction with the approach of “an important event for the entire Orthodox world” (see interview with the head of the Synodal Information Department of the Russian Orthodox Church Vladimir Legoyda to the Interfax-religion news agency). But is the upcoming “Pan-Orthodox Council” really necessary for the Ecumenical Church of Christ? Or are the believers right who are convinced that it will not serve to strengthen the unity of world Orthodoxy, but, on the contrary, will bring confusion into the minds and hearts of Christians all over the world?..” Next, the presenter formulated the main question, which the audience were called upon to answer: “Do we, Orthodox believers, need this cathedral or not?” and gave the floor V.N. Osipov.

Vladimir Nikolaevich first of all turned to the history of the emergence of the Orthodox Church. Formed by the holy apostles, it initially consisted of separate communities scattered throughout the Roman Empire and subject to persecution from the pagans. Then Emperor Constantine the Great granted Christianity the status of state religion. At this time, the majority of the Empire's population adhered to paganism or heresies. Only 10% were Christians, on whom Saint Constantine relied. Realizing that the spread of heretical teachings would seduce and turn away many people from the faith and the Church, the Emperor took upon himself the work of strengthening the church and decided to convene an Ecumenical Council.

Ecumenical Council- This the highest authority of the Church of Christ, guided by the Holy Spirit. Touching upon the history of the First Ecumenical Council, Vladimir Nikolaevich noted that it was held in 325 in Nicaea and it discussed the false teaching of the Alexandrian priest Arius, who rejected the Divinity and the eternal birth from the Father of the Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ. 318 Holy Fathers, among whom were Saints Nicholas the Wonderworker, Spyridon of Trimifuntsky, Hosea of Corduba, Alexander and Athanasius of Alexandria and many others, condemned the heresy of Arius and approved the doctrine of the Divinity of the Son of God, drawing up the Creed.

The speaker also briefly spoke about subsequent Ecumenical Councils and the issues considered at them. The last, Seventh Ecumenical Council took place in 787 in Constantinople and approved the veneration of icons; and the memory of the Holy Fathers of the Seven Ecumenical Councils is celebrated by the Orthodox Church on May 18/31. “The property of veneration of the Holy Fathers of the Ecumenical Councils is that– emphasized V.N. Osipov, – that only these Seven Ecumenical Councils, fully expressing the faith, will and reason of the Catholic Church, the fullness of Orthodoxy, have the right to make infallible and binding decisions for everyone in the field of the Christian faith and church dispensation.”

“Only with support and in close unity with the Kingdom can the priesthood endure, survive, and grow stronger. Without the Kingdom, the priesthood is unthinkable. All Seven Ecumenical Councils took place either by direct convocation of the Imperial government, or with its active support,”- said the writer. He noted that “all the Seven Ecumenical Councils solved the key problems of their time, decided how to navigate the church ship through reefs and shoals.”

After the historical excursion, the speaker turned to the problem of the upcoming “Pan-Orthodox Council”: “And suddenly, in the secular, post-Christian, Masonic 20th century, the church nomenklatura decides to do without a Tsar, without the support of sacred power, and at the same time not to fight any heresy, but to proclaim and approve its own new heresy - the super-heresy of ecumenism. Who is the initiator?

This was followed by a story about the organizer of the “Pan-Orthodox Council”, Patriarch-modernist Bartholomew (Archondonis), and the reforms that he wants, with the help of this forum, to carry out and approve in all Local Churches: the New Calendar calendar, weakening of fasts, deuteramy of the clergy, married episcopate and heresies-heresies – ecumenism.

The presenter focused on the topic of ecumenism, quoting the words of Elder Paisius the Holy Mountain of blessed memory: “This serpent has three heads: for the rich - Freemasonry, for the poor - communism, for the Orthodox - ecumenism.” I.Yu. Chepurnaya emphasized that the “Resistance Movement to the New World Order”, which organized the round table, is fighting not only against globalization, but also against ecumenism.

Olga Nikolaevna Chetverikova in her speech she analyzed in detail the stages of preparation for the council, as well as the last Istanbul meeting. She said that the “Pan-Orthodox Council” project is a clearly developed plan that has a specific goal, the ways of implementation of which are quite well known. Project “began to be implemented in 1962, i.e. after 1959, when Pope John XXIII came to power in the Vatican, already then, in January of this year, he declared the need to hold a second Vatican Council to resolve the issue of opening the Catholic “Church” to the world in in accordance with new circumstances and operating conditions. And in 1961, the first Rhodes Conference convened by Patriarch Athenagoras met, at which it was announced that preparations for the “Pan-Orthodox Council” had begun.”

Olga Nikolaevna touched upon the history of the Second Vatican Council and the new Uniate concept put forward by the Vatican: “This new concept of ecumenism allowed Catholics to open up to dialogue with other religions, while maintaining complete integrity of the rule of the Pope. In fact, we can define Catholic ecumenism as a new form of union. That is, the ecumenism that the Vatican offers us is actually a union, its unofficial form.” We are constantly told about the need for Christian unity. But then “The unity that Catholics seek, that the Pope craves, is only possible if the Orthodox Churches recognize the Roman Pontiff as the successor of Peter and the head of the Christian Church.”

Continued on page 7

rivka381 in post

Interesting take on ISIS. Resistance to the New World Order (NWO), but doomed to failure due to a lack of understanding of the essence of this NWO.
Their Ancestor Gods helped the ancient Slavs for the reason (well, firstly, the planet was in the light of a galactic ray, and not at the bottom, as it is now) because they ASKED for help or asked for advice. For a long time of being at the bottom in darkness and the absence of the light of the Galactic ray, we are potentially such Gods, only we have not yet grown spiritually, we have forgotten how to ask for help from our genetic parents. We have lost the memory that they exist at all. So we live in a special school for juvenile delinquents with strict God-educators. And the regime is getting stronger. Everyone can ask for help from their KIND (these are thousands of our ancestors) right up to the First Ancestors-Gods along the genetic chain and they will help us. With each such appeal, the genetic chain comes to life, this is the channel to the Ancestor Gods, genes wake up. who slept during the Galactic Night. I agree about replacing the Light Gods with the Dark Gods, it was done very cleverly, for example, I’ve been figuring it out for decades. Although it seems that the Old Believers are close by and with the priests of the Russian Orthodox Church, she communicated with yogis in India and with teachers. The freedom of choice was taken away due to our ignorance. Even those who strive for light fall into the trap of darkness. But with your heart it’s easy to feel what energies are in what church or teaching. The Russian Orthodox Church left only cemetery churches or cathedrals available. Only the world of Navi worshiped, commemorated ancestors and everything, but the Slavs were distinguished by the fact that they GLORIFIED the Gods, i.e. the world was worshiped with GLORY and RULE. As a result, in the real Russian Orthodox Church, young people or middle-aged people have nowhere to go in terms of energy, and the Russian Orthodox Church has become a church of old women who are thinking about death. Which corresponds to the energy of cemetery churches.

"...And first of all, this is the understanding that people have the Sacred Right of Choice. If at present people remain indifferent to the rapid increase in aggression of the New World Order and, like a herd of sacrificial sheep, enter the stall of all the restrictions created by the NWO, then after some, very short time, only a short memory of official tasks at one job or another will remain from human consciousness, and nothing more will grow rapidly, and soon the Earth will become a breeding ground for wretched biologically unpromising material, with monstrous deviations in the genetic apparatus. deformities incompatible with life without constant replacement either by alien organs or mechanical extensions that make a person a cyborg, the NWO will quickly consume a batch of biorobots right on the spot, and send some of them into space of the comic bottom to look for a new planet for their owners with the same carefree population, incapable of assessing the real danger of being involved in genetic experiments of cosmic bottom-dwelling devil-monsters... And everything will repeat itself exactly according to the same scenario, which over eons of time has already been worked out to a mechanism and always operates until the population of any planet that survives until the evolutionary stage of leaving the Cosmic Bottom of his system, he does not realize his legitimate Right of Freedom and Choice and does not finally choose the direction towards the Light. Then the spell of the forces of Darkness falls apart, and they are no longer able to resist, since the action of the Forces of Light goes beyond their capabilities of influence. It's like a benthic crayfish can't affect a bird of the sky when it flies. But when for some reason she falls to the bottom of the ocean, she legally becomes the prey of a cancer - a corpse eater..."

Any threat, be it real or only apparent, gives rise to counteraction, that is, resistance. It's logical that , according to which some secret organizations are trying to seize power over the whole world, which has become quite widespread, has led to the emergence of people ready to fight such a threat. Resistance to the new world order is predominantly theoretical in nature, since this order is usually viewed in a theoretical manner. However, in recent years, social movements have emerged whose activities can be qualified as a fight against the impending new world order.

Those who do not want to live in the new world

To the greatest extent, among actually existing social movements and organizations, the title of fighters against the new world order anti-globalists correspond. At the turn of the 20th-21st centuries, it became obvious not only that the world was developing according to the globalization scenario, but also that this scenario implied many negative consequences. Anti-globalists are extremely diverse in their political, philosophical, religious and other views. There is still no official political party or organization for which anti-globalism is the basis of its ideological platform.

Opposing certain areas of anti-globalism or, less often, against this phenomenon itself, is always an addition to certain basic ideas and values of a particular organization. The semi-official date of birth of the anti-globalization movement is December 1999. Then, in Seattle, America, there were mass demonstrations and riots against the World Trade Organization (WTO) summit being held in the city at that time. Active protests against the activities of the WTO became the first unifying slogan, on the basis of which anarchists, left-wing radicals, nationalists of various kinds, environmentalists, representatives of alternative religious teachings and many others united.

speaking out against the policies of international financial organizations responsible for perpetuating the unequal position of developed and developing countries. First of all, these are the WTO, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank. Anti-globalists are confident that the policies of these institutions are aimed at protecting the interests of developed countries and preventing the development of “third world” countries;
rejection of modern standards of the global socio-economic sphere, in which basic benefits and resources go to a minority (“golden billion”), while the majority of the population does not receive decent living conditions;
the dominance of transnational corporations, which, firstly, maximally contribute to the division of labor in the international market, assigning residents of developing countries the role of cheap unskilled labor. Secondly, transnational corporations are an alternative and adversary to nation states, which naturally impede the receipt of excess profits. For this reason, according to anti-globalizationists, corporations help to destabilize the very structure of sovereign states so that they can be more easily manipulated;
predatory exploitation of natural resources by humanity and criminal attitude towards the environment. This is fraught both from a socio-economic point of view and in terms of the basic survival of humanity. In the first case, resources are pumped out in the interests of the “golden billion”, and the rest of the population does not receive any dividends from this. In addition, lack of attention to the environmental problem can put humanity on the brink of disaster in just a few generations;
standards of mass popular culture imposed on the modern generation through the media and communications, leading to the intellectual, moral and creative degradation of people.

From the “Black Bloc” to home-grown fighters against world evil

As specific examples of modern organizations, the ideology, values and nature of whose activities allow us to classify them as anti-globalists, we can name two movements. The first of them is the “Black Bloc”, a movement of radical anti-globalists. The brutal name is no coincidence: members of this organization, which appeared in the 1980s in Germany, wear black clothes and hide their faces behind black masks. Due to their frequent clashes with law enforcement forces and participation in acts of disobedience, such a dress code is understandable. The core of the organization is made up of anarchists, but they are also joined by other opponents of capitalism, a strong state and globalization.

The “Black Bloc” consistently acts:

against private ownership of the means of production and real estate;
against the state as an instrument of control over people;
against any form of discrimination;
against the existence of the repressive apparatus (police, army, etc.);
against the reckless exploitation of nature and not motivated by the real needs of humanity;
against modern mass culture, the media, the inculcation of the “cult of consumption”;
ultimately - for a worldwide anti-capitalist libertarian (that is, denying all forms of organized violence) revolution.

In Russia, anti-globalism, like almost any phenomenon on a national basis, has transformed into an interesting phenomenon known as the Resistance Movement to the World Order. It was created in 2013 and positions itself as an organization to fight the coming world order. The ideological basis of this movement is anti-globalism, modern eschatologism (expectation of the imminent End of the World), rather primitively understood provisions of Orthodoxy, confidence in the existence of a Masonic conspiracy, the purpose of which is to establish the kingdom of the Antichrist on the ground. Thus, the ideological content consists of many conspiracy theories in a religious Orthodox shell.

According to the participants of the Resistance Movement to the World Order, the End of the World predicted in Christianity and the totalitarian satanic regime that preceded it, that very new world order, are approaching. Its ideological orientation is defined as anti-Christian, and the trends of modern globalization are regarded as clear signs of its approach. It is curious that at the same time, theoretical issues and practical skills of autonomous survival in a post-apocalyptic world after the death of a developed civilization are being actively studied. To this end, it is considered how to master the basics of gathering, hunting, fishing, running your own agriculture, basic crafts, the basics of medicine and applied science.

Alexander Babitsky

“World Evil against Russia”, held in Moscow on February 28, 2015. The conference was moderated by Tatyana Lemesheva. The main report was read by V.N. Osipov. The burning problems of our time were touched upon: the war of international Freemasonry with Orthodoxy and Russia, the Second Vatican Council and the Judaization of Catholicism, Satanism in the USA, the betrayal of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and especially Washington’s faithful ally and CIA informant Patriarch Bartholomew, anti-Christ globalization, the three mondialist structures of the World Government, treachery Judas Gorbachev and the role of his Foundation for the creation of the United Religions, etc.

Vice-President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems K.N. Sokolov spoke about the struggle of world evil against all humanity. He also described the education reform in the Russian Federation as a complete transition to NATO education.

The bright speech of the honorary lawyer of the Moscow Region Bar Association, I.Yu. Chepurnaya, included the theme of the myth of the divinely chosen Jews, destroyed by Christ, the Russian state as the Holder of evil, the need to resist world evil, incl. personal and communal repentance, the unceasing Jesus Prayer, observance of the Gospel commandments and firm standing in the faith. It is necessary to continue working to protect the constitutional rights of Russian citizens, incl. the right to “live and act in accordance with one’s religious beliefs.” It was noted that Patriarch Kirill raised his voice in the State Duma regarding a number of anti-people laws, incl. about digital identity. But, unfortunately, there are still questions. The Church has not yet said its word about the spiritual meaning of digital identification.

I.M. Chislov, writer, chairman of the Russian-Serbian Friendship Society, dedicated his speech to the mystery of lawlessness. The God-bearing people are fighting against the God-killing people. Near Debaltsevo, the Americans who fought with the people of Novorossiya and the Israeli special forces were released. Angela Merkel especially zealously worked for the release of Israeli soldiers.

N.N. Mishustin, head of the working group for the protection of families and children under the Moscow City Duma, said with bitterness that they were again concluding agreements with other states on the adoption of children from Russia. Such an agreement was signed, for example, with Spain, a country where sodomy is rampant today, and with a dozen other countries, even with Uruguay. Where do they get such love for our children? Or are they needed for organs? There are four “blue” theaters in Moscow. The current school card is a children's UEK. Black transplant surgeons flew to Serbia before the war to take advantage of the wounded and children.

T.S. Lemesheva recalled that the UN condemned Nazism and other forms of racial discrimination. At the same time, the UN Children's Fund recognizes same-sex marriage. Members of the ruling Kyiv junta have a second citizenship - Jewish. Did Bandera's followers fraternize with Zionism? I am surprised by the tolerant attitude towards homosexuality. She made a proposal to legislate the responsibility of deputies who initiate the adoption of anti-people laws that are aimed at discriminating against Orthodox Christians in Russia and do not ensure the safety of the Russian people and other citizens of the Russian Federation.

At the conference on February 28, 2015, a resolution on Kolomoisky was unanimously adopted. It will be sent to the Pan-European Jewish Congress, the Russian Jewish Congress, the Government of Ukraine, the Government of the State of Israel and the UN. The resolution demands immediate and harsh condemnation of the actions of the governor of the Dnepropetrovsk region of Ukraine, Igor Kolomoisky, who is one of the individuals who sponsored not only the bloody actions of the so-called. Maidan, which then led to a coup d'etat in Ukraine, but also now contains fascist paramilitary units “Aidar”, “Dnepr”, “Right Sector” and others. Unlike other figures of the damned days in Ukraine, Igor Kolomoisky is a zealous Jew, a permanent parishioner of the Dnepropetrovsk and Kyiv synagogues, strictly observing the canons of Judaism, and therefore also holds the post of President of the Pan-European Jewish Congress..

“Is it possible to combine such a high position, liturgical activity, and simply belonging to the Jewish people with acts of the cruelest executions of the Slavic population of Ukraine, genocide and holocaust of the Russian people of the south-east of Ukraine?... We believe that the Jewish people, also suffering from the world fascist shocks, is obliged to stop the atrocities of his co-religionist and leader of the Pan-European Jewish Congress.”

Poet Nikolai Bogolyubov spoke about the criminal case initiated against his poetic work.

E.B. Malyutina spoke about the impudence of officials who demand the surrender of personal data for any reason. They even refuse to accept the Unified State Exam without first submitting personal data. In Yaroslavl I had to go to court. But, unfortunately, even Orthodox clergy spoke out against parents who protect their children from sharing personal data with everyone (including bandits and the NATO bloc). They do not care about the principled position of the Hierarchy, personally Patriarch Kirill, who condemn the forced surrender of personal data. But the Yaroslavl court (the lawyer for the persecuted was Irina Yuryevna Chepurnaya) in August 2014 ruled in favor of the parents and their children. And, despite the court’s decision, the Ministry of Education and other authorities still require the submission of personal data

The conference adopted a detailed resolution on legal issues:

We demand a ban on assigning digital identifiers and artificially created digital names to a person. The draft Federal Law “On the main identification document of a citizen of the Russian Federation” is clearly anti-constitutional in nature. If adopted, it will create a threat to the national security of Russia and its citizens. We demand the denunciation (termination) of international documents (Conventions, Charters) recommending or obliging Russia to join a supranational entity - the global information society. Repeal federal laws and by-laws adopted on the basis of these international documents, incl. “Concept for the formation of the information society in Russia” dated May 28, 1999 No. 32, “Strategy for the development of the electronic industry in Russia for the period until 2025”, “Concept for the formation of electronic government in Russia until 2010” etc., because all these documents are aimed at building an illegal “electronic government”, at the abolition of all fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen. And also for chipping, cloning and destroying the binary code of humanity. Repeal federal laws: “On the provision of state and municipal services” (No. 210). “On personal data” (No. 152 of April 1, 1996), “On individual (personalized) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system” ((No. 27 of December 15, 2001) and the like. Prohibit medical institutions and insurance campaigns from using human identity identifiers (EPP, SNILS), identification chips, barcodes, nano-devices, cybernization of the human body and brain.

Enshrine at the legislative level the prohibition of taking children away from their parents without a judicial procedure... ban the practice of using Western-style juvenile justice in Russia.

Abolish the colonial Article 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on the priority of international laws over domestic laws. Restore the state-forming status of the Russian people.

The Constitution of the Russian Federation recognizes Orthodoxy as the state religion in the manner prescribed by law.

Ban Russophobia in the media and introduce spiritual and moral censorship on it. Introduce the subject “Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture” in schools from the 1st grade of primary school.

In order to protect our Fatherland and personal self-defense, based on the legislation of the Russian Federation, we demand:

- Talmudic ideology and guidelines for action - the book “Kitzur Shulchan Aruch” (with its primary sources) is rightfully and factually declared extremist and banned...

- officially recognize by right - the Holocaust of the Russian Orthodox people during the organized and carried out Masonic October Revolution with the ritual murder of the holy royal martyrs and passion-bearers, as well as during the repressions in the post-revolutionary period, the Holocaust of the Kuban, Don and Terek Cossacks in 1919 - 1923 ., in Crimea. ......

We share and support the serious views expressed in the following documents:

- Memorandum of Holy Mount Athos on the need for the Russian Orthodox Church to withdraw from the World Council of Churches.

- Message of June 3, 1998 of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, expressed in that “the process of falling away from God and His grace... is now secretly taking place in the depths of human hearts,” and “... an individual identification number (with the above conditions) ... can become the seal of the Antichrist.”

- the decision of the Greek Orthodox Church, which called on its children to refuse electronic documents,

- the voice of the fathers of the Pochaev Lavra, Moldova, desert dwellers, monk Constantine and the brethren of the Holy Trinity Skete, founded in 1973 in the Caucasus Mountains with the blessing of St. Seraphim of Glinsky and Sukhumi,

- a sober attitude to this issue of bishops and elders of other Local Churches who do not approve of the adoption of digital identifiers,

...Accepting a digital identifier is a manifestation of “humble” submission and the beginning of serving the coming Antichrist in the person of the behind-the-scenes of the “new world order.”

In order to end disagreements and achieve the intra-church unanimity commanded by Christ, we believe that it is necessary to continue the consideration of the problem begun by the commission of the Inter-Council Presence and

1) To give a theological assessment of the essence of the sin of accepting personal digital identifiers in the light of the New Testament commandments of Christ,

2) Continue work on the Document “On the position of the Church...” not only in the context of church-state relations, but also in the light of patristic teaching on this topic,

3) To develop and publish a comprehensive concept of the position of the Church, to bring it to the consciousness of all believers, calling for more zealous and diligent living according to the Gospel commandments.

4) We hope that the hierarchy will find it expedient to continue and deepen the theological discussion of this issue....

This Resolution should be sent to: the President of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the heads of factions of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the relevant committees of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, the FSB of the Russian Federation, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation , Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation... Governors of regions, territories and heads of republics, in the media..., as well as His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Rus', in the DECR, Archpastors of the Russian Orthodox Church MP.

Participants of the conference “World Evil against Russia”: V.N. Osipov, I.Yu. Chepurnaya, T.S. Lemesheva, I.M. Chislov, E.A. Pavlov, L.S. Nemchinova, E.A. Kirichenko , M.M. Obolensky, M. Abdullin, S.A. Matveev and others (about 350 people).

We ask you to consider this resolution as an official Appeal from representatives of public organizations and citizens of the Russian Federation.

The conference lasted eight hours, from 12 to 20, and was held on a highly spiritual level.

Conference on the topic: “World evil against Russia.” (Part -1)

the report was read by V.N. Osipov. The burning problems of our time were touched upon: the war of international Freemasonry with Orthodoxy and Russia, the Second Vatican Council and the Judaization of Catholicism, Satanism in the USA, the betrayal of the Patriarchate of Constantinople